EntitySEO.wikiThe Entity SEO Reference

Local search: patents

From EntitySEO.wiki, the entity SEO reference · Last reviewed · By · Published by Local Blitz · How we research

Local search patents describe how Google could rank businesses for place-based searches: scoring a business’s prominence from references and reviews across the web, adjusting for distance, detecting fake map listings and matching business details to addresses. Seven Google patents are listed. Google’s own summary of local ranking is relevance, distance and prominence.

Read this first: a patent shows that a company sought legal protection for a method. It does not show that the method is used in Google Search, used as written, or still used. Only systems Google itself names (for example in its ranking systems guide) are confirmed. Dates and legal status come from Google Patents, which notes that its legal status is “an assumption and is not a legal conclusion”. See how to read a patent.

What does this theme cover?

Google says local results are “mainly based on relevance, distance, and popularity” and explains that prominence is “based on info like how many websites link to your business and how many reviews you have”.[1] Officially documented The patents below describe more specific mechanisms. They sit behind the practical advice in local SEO, Google Business Profile and NAP and citations, and AEO.wiki’s local AEO.

We list no research papers here: we did not find peer-reviewed papers we could verify as describing Google’s local ranking specifically.

Which patents describe local search ranking?

Scoring local search results based on location prominence

Patent US 8,046,371 B2 Patent: use unconfirmed · Assignee Google LLC · Inventors Brian O'Clair, Daniel Egnor, Lawrence E Greenfield · Priority May 27, 2005 · Filed Sep 29, 2010 · Granted Oct 25, 2011 · Status Expired - Lifetime

What it describes: Scoring local results for a geographic area using prominence rather than distance alone. The description lists factors including a score for the business’s authoritative document (its official page), the total number of documents referring to the business, the highest score among those documents, the number of documents with reviews of the business, and the number of information documents that mention it.

Why it matters for SEO: This is the closest patent match to what Google calls prominence. Citations, mentions, reviews across the web and a strong official site all feature. See NAP and citations. Practitioner practice

Distance based search ranking demotion

Patent US 9,262,541 B2 Patent: use unconfirmed · Assignee Google LLC · Inventors Neha Arora · Priority Oct 18, 2013 · Filed Oct 18, 2013 · Granted Feb 16, 2016 · Status Active

What it describes: Demoting a local result when a proximity measure between the user’s device and the result’s location shows it is far away compared with other local results.

Why it matters for SEO: Distance can outweigh relevance for some searches. You cannot move, but accurate location data and service-area settings in your Business Profile matter.

Local business ranking using mapping information

Patent US 8,312,010 B1 Patent: use unconfirmed · Assignee Google LLC · Inventors Johnny Chen, Clarence Chris Mysen · Priority Aug 16, 2007 · Filed Aug 16, 2007 · Granted Nov 13, 2012 · Status Expired - Fee Related

What it describes: Ranking local businesses using signals that indicate actions related to business listings, then ordering listings in response to a search based on that ranking.

Why it matters for SEO: Engagement with listings (the patent speaks of “actions related to” them) may inform local ranking. A complete, accurate profile earns genuine engagement; fake engagement breaks Google’s policies.[2]

Ranking location search results based on multiple distance measures

Patent US 8,898,173 B1 Patent: use unconfirmed · Assignee Google LLC · Inventors Mihai Badoiu · Priority May 14, 2010 · Filed May 14, 2010 · Granted Nov 25, 2014 · Status Expired - Fee Related

What it describes: A location relevance score based on three distances to a result’s address: from a polygon approximating the region’s boundary, from the combined area of the region’s ZIP codes, and from a central location.

Why it matters for SEO: Being “in” a city can be judged in several ways. Use a real, consistent address and describe your service areas honestly.

Map spam detection

Patent US 8,694,489 B1 Patent: use unconfirmed · Assignee Google LLC · Inventors Baris Yuksel, Ashutosh Kulshreshtha · Priority Oct 1, 2010 · Filed Oct 1, 2010 · Granted Apr 8, 2014 · Status Expired - Fee Related

What it describes: Detecting mapped business listings that do not match a real location, using factors such as unusually high density of a business category in an area, different listings sharing the same identifying data, and neighbourhood characteristics.

Why it matters for SEO: Map spam tactics (fake addresses, duplicate listings) create exactly these patterns. Keep one accurate listing per real location; see Google’s representation guidelines.[3]

Local item extraction

Patent US 7,831,438 B2 Patent: use unconfirmed · Assignee Google LLC · Inventors Michael Dennis Riley · Priority Dec 30, 2004 · Filed Dec 30, 2004 · Granted Nov 9, 2010 · Status Expired - Fee Related

What it describes: Extracting business information that appears near an address in a web page and assigning a confidence score that the business information belongs to that address.

Why it matters for SEO: This is how a citation might be matched to your business. Consistent name, address and phone formatting near each other on your pages and citations supports the match. Practitioner practice

Universal scores for location search queries

Patent US 8,463,774 B1 Patent: use unconfirmed · Assignee Google LLC · Inventors Florian Michel Buron, Alex Bailey, Alan Strohm, László Lukács, Diana Stroe, Fabrice Caillette, Johan Larsson Tibell · Priority Jul 15, 2008 · Filed Jul 15, 2008 · Granted Jun 11, 2013 · Status Expired - Fee Related

What it describes: Ranking geographic feature documents for location searches using address support scores, including standalone and template support scores.

Why it matters for SEO: Address data that is supported across many documents is treated as more reliable. Consistent NAP across the web is the practical takeaway.

What should you do with this?

Frequently asked questions

What are Google's local ranking factors?

Google says local results are mainly based on relevance, distance and prominence (which it also calls popularity), and that links and reviews inform prominence.

Which patent covers local prominence?

US 8,046,371 B2, 'Scoring local search results based on location prominence', by Brian O'Clair, Daniel Egnor and Lawrence E. Greenfield, granted October 25, 2011.

Does Google detect fake listings?

Google has policies against misrepresentation and fake engagement, and US 8,694,489 B1 describes one method of detecting map spam. The patent does not show which methods Google uses.

References

Pages accessed September 29, 2026 unless a date is given. See all sources and our editorial policy.

  1. ^ "Tips to improve your local ranking on Google". Google Business Profile Help.
  2. ^ "Maps user-generated content policy: fake engagement". Google Maps Help.
  3. ^ "Guidelines for representing your business on Google". Google Business Profile Help.
  4. ^ "Federal Trade Commission announces final rule banning fake reviews and testimonials". U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Published August 14, 2024.