Related entities and co-occurrence
Related entities are the things that are consistently connected to a topic, such as the tools, standards, people, places and sub-concepts that a complete explanation mentions. You find them through knowledge graph relationships (Wikidata statements, “People also search for”), through co-occurrence in top-ranking pages, and from your own expertise. Use them to plan coverage and internal links, not as a keyword list.
What is co-occurrence?
Co-occurrence means two entities or terms appearing together across many documents. If most authoritative pages about “knowledge panels” also mention “Knowledge Graph” and “Google Business Profile”, those entities are strongly related to the topic. The idea comes from general information-retrieval practice; Google does not publish how it uses co-occurrence. Practitioner practice
Where do you find related entities?
| Source | How |
|---|---|
| Wikidata | Follow statements such as part of, subclass of, founded by, instance of[1] |
| Knowledge panels | “People also search for” lists entities Google groups together |
| SERPs | Related searches and “People also ask” |
| Top pages | Run them through the Natural Language API and list shared entities |
| Wikipedia | The first links in a topic’s article and its categories |
| Your experience | Entities customers raise that competitors miss |
How do you turn related entities into a plan?
- Group entities: core (must be explained), supporting (mention and link) and peripheral (skip).
- Give each core entity a section or its own page.
- Link mentions to the page that explains that entity (internal linking).
- Use schema.org
aboutfor the main entity andmentionsfor important secondary ones.[2][3] - Record everything in your entity map.
How is this different from keyword lists?
Keyword tools list phrasings; related entities list things. A page can use every keyword variation and still miss a concept that a complete answer needs. Google’s helpful content guidance asks whether content provides “a substantial, complete, or comprehensive description of the topic.”[4] Officially documented See topical authority.
Frequently asked questions
Is co-occurrence a Google ranking factor?
Google has not documented it as one. It is a practical way to see what complete coverage of a topic looks like.
How many related entities should a page mention?
As many as a complete, helpful answer needs, and no more. Coverage should follow the reader's needs, not a count.
See also
References
Pages accessed September 29, 2026 unless a date is given. See all sources and our editorial policy.
- ^ "Help: Statements". Wikidata.
- ^ "about property". Schema.org.
- ^ "mentions property". Schema.org.
- ^ "Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content". Google Search Central.